Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin III signed a memo on Friday in which he calls for “immediate actions” to weed out “extremist behavior” in the military.
The new orders come after Austin has spoken with advisers and reviewed the results of the Defense Department-wide stand down issued in early February.
The memo said, “The vast majority of those who serve in uniform and their civilian colleagues do so with great honor and integrity, but any extremist behavior in the force can have an outsized impact.”
Chief Pentagon spokesman John Kirby reiterated this statement in a news conference on Friday and added that, “The vast majority of those serving are not espousing these ideologies. Yet even the few doing so have a corrosive effect.”
Kirby indicated that “these actions are critical first steps.”
The first step is the establishment of a “countering extremism working group” to manage the implementation of “these immediate actions and also work toward intermediate and long-range goals.”
Austin asks for DOD officials to “review and update the definition of extremism.” An article on the Pentagon’s website indicates that many service members have “asked for a clear definition of extremism.”
An update will be made to “transitioning instructions” to warn “those who are leaving the military of the dangers posed by extremist groups.” Kirby noted that “some extremist groups are actively trying to recruit military members who possess leadership abilities, planning expertise and knowledge of weapons that these groups desire.”
Austin has “ordered the services to work closer together and learn best practices from each other to ensure extremists do not get into the ranks.” He is encouraging the various services to share information about potential threats.
Finally, Austin has commissioned a study “on extremist behavior within our Total Force, to include gaining greater fidelity on the scope of the problem.” And this group will meet around April 14 and be given 90 days to submit their “recommendations for medium-range and long-range plans to combat this scourge” to Austin.
“I think the working group wants to look at how well (the services) are interconnected, and how robustly they are sharing information, best practices, to include data collection through partnership with the law enforcement organizations, as well as commanders and supervisors,” Kirby said.
Many on the right have taken issue with Austin’s campaign to root out extremism inside the military as being political in nature. As most government agencies have grown hyperpartisan over the years, the military has, for the most part, managed to buck that trend.
Austin’s Department of Defense has now joined the fight against climate change which the Biden Administration considers to be a threat to our national security.
The Hill reported that on March 9, Austin sent a memo to senior Pentagon leadership announcing the formation of a “Climate Change Working Group.”
Climate change presents a growing threat to U.S. national security interests and defense objectives. The changing climate is altering the global security and operating environments, impacting our missions, plans and installations…
We will incorporate climate risk analysis into all of our work from installation planning; to modeling, simulation, and war gaming; to the National Defense Strategy and all other relevant strategy, planning, and programming documents and processes including those supporting decision making in the Military Departments.
Whether it is increasing platform efficiency to improve freedom of action in contested logistics environments, or deploying new energy solutions to strengthen resilience of key capabilities at installations, our mission objectives are well aligned with our climate goals.
The Pentagon has also addressed issues of sexism in the armed forces. He has taken measures to make women in the military feel more respected and included going so far as to design maternity flight suits.
All of this certainly comes from White House directives, but it has introduced politics into an organization that has remained, and should continue to remain, apolitical.