Anti-White racism

Medical Journal Describes Whiteness as ‘a malignant, parasitic-like condition’ which ‘renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse’

Photo Credit: Image by Reimund Bertrams from Pixabay

Last month, the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association saw fit to publish a “research article” entitled “On Having Whiteness” that was so vile and racist, even Newsweek appeared to be repelled by it.

The author, Dr. Donald Moss, who is white, describes “Whiteness” as “a malignant, parasitic-like condition” that primarily afflicts white people. “Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples.” Those who contract this disorder are pretty much doomed, for Moss tells us “there is not yet a permanent cure.”

Below is the author’s abstract:

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.

Rather than a scholarly description of a newly identified disorder, this article strikes me as the product of an individual who has been so completely immersed in the left’s war on “systemic racism,” that he can no longer see clearly.

This is not medical research, it’s politics. It’s propaganda thinly disguised as research. It’s meant to be trotted out as if to “prove” a political point.

Moss’ words are so absurd, they almost make Nikole Hannah-Jones, the creator of the 1619 Project, sound reasonable. Almost.

If one were trying to describe the symptoms of the affliction that has taken hold and spread throughout the American left in recent years like a California wildfire, Moss’ article could be “Exhibit A.”

This is the kind of dangerous and radical propaganda that dehumanizes entire groups of people and has historically served as the rationale behind genocides.

Is there any question that, if they could, the far left would put all conservatives into work camps?

This man has completely lost touch with reality and should himself seek psychiatric help.

The Daily Mail reports that Moss teaches psychoanalysis at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute and the San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis.

Fortunately, this article was widely condemned by people across the political spectrum.

Dr. Philip Pellegrino, a psychologist tweeted: ‘How do my colleagues consider this scholarship?’

Here are some of the responses to Dr. Pellegrino’s post:

For more of Dr. Moss’ work, click here. Yes, I’m kidding.

Please follow me on Twitter.

 

1 reply »

  1. This “parasitic whiteness” article is so extreme it’s almost laughable, though at some point in times past, it might have described isolated individuals. Today, no, these words fail to characterize the bulk of white persons now living. Thank you for bringing this to everyone’s attention. It is indeed odd that within a short space of time, two seemingly credentialed mental health professionals have come out with such statements. I think it does signal that there is a move toward demonizing persons who are not of some degree of brownness or blackness in their skin. This is all so silly as character is not determined by the degree of melanin in the skin. It is an extreme over-reaction, an attempt to correct the mistakes of the past with an over-reaction in the present.

Leave a Reply